Dana DeGiulio & Molly Zuckerman-Hartung “Queen”

Lyles & King

poster for Dana DeGiulio & Molly Zuckerman-Hartung “Queen”

This event has ended.

She decides the palette, the setting, the sequence. When it comes
time to film, it’s all done out of order: that actor is only available this
month, there are intensities that cannot be repeated, certain
relationships take time to accrue. She imagines the film projected in
the order of its making. Actors expecting paychecks receive IOUs;
turns out the budget’s been blown on make-up.

She performs postures that someone made before her, and because of
this she can never forget history. Particular positions are painful to
endure and she practices the action repeatedly. Each time, the
emphasis shifts; this marks time. The audience is eclipsed by the
stage lights. The show never stops and they never go home.

- Michaela Murphy

For conservators, an accretion is defined as “a growth or accumulation of material on the exterior surface of an object.” A kind of thickness. “Accretions may be unintentional (dirt, salts, corrosion, insect deposits, guano, drips, burial deposits) or intentional (expansion, alteration) additions that change the appearance of the object.” Until recently (before moving to New York), Molly Zuckerman-Hartung’s paintings have been something akin to accretions. The time Molly spent in her studio was visible as layers, deposits, accumulations––reflecting (she told me) a kind of anxiety or self-doubt about when a painting was finished, as well as a desire to make every idea ever cohere within the space of a painting (which sometimes meant extruding from or expanding the edges of the frame).


It’s December, and Molly, Dana DeGiulio, Michaela Murphy and I are sitting in Molly’s studio, talking about the relationship between Molly’s and Dana’s paintings. Molly says (with some envy) that Dana is a “narrative” thinker (and painter), capable of building up a story over time: Dana’s work is “durational.” Molly claims she’s incapable of thinking that way (despite aspiring to)—that for her, painting has often been a struggle to force a temporal narrative into the frame of a painting. Her new paintings reflect a “relational” approach to painting, rather than a durational one. They’re loosely structured by patchwork grids, but unlike the rigid aesthetics of a chart these porous grids are a way to say that proximate does not imply equivalent. Viscous paint seeps back to front, the “text” can be read in any direction. Thick Description, without the thickness.

Dana lives in her studio, for the first time in a decade. This means co-existing with things (whether they are flowers or paintings or paintings of flowers) and seeing how they change over time; confronting duration from your bed, or while washing the dishes. Or, as Dana says, “Having to live with what you make.” But that’s also relational. Everything is there, next to everything else. A rectangle of lavender and grey, next to seven dead/alive roses on an oblong of black. Proximate doesn’t imply equivalent. It’s just the space we’re living in.

To distract myself from my anxiety about writing about paintings (my fear of an inability to make a coherent narrative), I start reading some old anthropologists. It makes sense, in a way, since painting feels like a foreign country to me. In his manifesto for Thick Description, Clifford Geertz writes: “Coherence cannot be the major test of validity for a cultural description.” This applies equally to the individual paintings in this show; to the paintings hung together as A Show; and to my writing about these paintings in this show.

-Lisa Darms

Dana DeGiulio was born in 1978 in Chicago Heights, and recently relocated to New York after years in Chicago. She received her MFA in 2007 from the School of the Art institute of Chicago. Recent solo exhibitions include Dan DeGiulio at The Suburban (Chicago, IL); Dana DeGiulio Flash! at the Museum of Contemporary Photography (Riverside, CA). Recent group exhibitions include Sensitive Instruments, curated by Molly Zuckerman-Hartung at Corbett vs. Dempsey (Chicago, IL) and Noncompliance, curated by Carrie Schneider at Iceberg Projects (Chicago, IL). She is a founder of Julius Caesar, an artist-run exhibition space in Chicago. Queen is her first exhibition with Lyles & King.


Molly Zuckerman-Hartung was born in 1975 in Los Gatos, CA, and recently relocated to New York after years in Chicago. She received her MFA in 2007 from the School of the Art Institute of Chicago. Her work is included in the collections of The Walker Art Center (Minneapolis, MN), the Museum of Contemporary Art Chicago (Chicago, IL); and the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago (Chicago, IL). Recent exhibitions include Painter, Painter at the Walker Art Center, (Minneapolis, MN); 2014 Whitney Biennial at the Whitney Museum of American Art (New York, NY); The Program at ReMap4 (Athens, Greece); Michelle Grabner: I Work From Home at MOCA Cleveland (Cleveland, OH); and Violet Fogs Azure Snot at Corbett vs. Dempsey (Chicago, IL). Queen is Zuckerman-Hartung’s first exhibition with Lyles & King. She is represented by Corbett vs. Dempsey.

Media

Schedule

from January 08, 2016 to February 07, 2016

Opening Reception on 2016-01-08 from 18:00 to 20:00

  • Facebook

    Reviews

    All content on this site is © their respective owner(s).
    New York Art Beat (2008) - About - Contact - Privacy - Terms of Use